Qui Tam Actions and Whistleblower Protections: What Paralegals Need to Know

Qui Tam Actions and Whistleblower Protections

Qui tam actions are a unique form of litigation in which private citizens, known as relators, file lawsuits on behalf of the government to recover funds lost to fraud. These cases, primarily brought under the federal False Claims Act (FCA), allow ordinary individuals to serve as private attorneys general, exposing fraud against government programs and sharing in any recovery. For paralegals and CP exam candidates, qui tam actions represent a fascinating intersection of civil litigation, government regulation, and public policy.

What Is a Qui Tam Action?

The term "qui tam" comes from the Latin phrase "qui tam pro domino rege quam pro se ipso in hac parte sequitur," meaning "who sues in this matter for the king as well as for himself." In modern practice, a qui tam action allows a private individual (the relator) to file a lawsuit alleging that a person or entity has defrauded the federal government.

The False Claims Act, originally enacted during the Civil War to combat defense contractor fraud, provides the primary statutory basis for qui tam actions. The Act prohibits:

• Knowingly presenting a false or fraudulent claim for payment to the government
• Knowingly making or using a false record or statement material to a false claim
• Conspiring to commit a violation of the Act
• Knowingly making or using a false record to conceal, avoid, or decrease an obligation to pay money to the government (reverse false claims)

How Is a Qui Tam Case Filed?

The filing process for a qui tam case differs significantly from ordinary civil litigation:

• Complaint Filed Under Seal: The relator files the complaint in federal court under seal, meaning it is not served on the defendant or made public. This gives the government time to investigate the allegations without alerting the target.
• Disclosure Statement: Along with the complaint, the relator must provide the government with a written disclosure of substantially all material evidence and information in their possession.
• Government Investigation: The complaint remains under seal for at least 60 days while the Department of Justice investigates the allegations. The court may grant extensions of the seal period, and investigations commonly last 12 to 24 months or longer.
• Government Intervention Decision: After investigating, the government decides whether to intervene (take over the case) or decline to intervene (allow the relator to proceed independently). Government intervention significantly increases the likelihood of a successful outcome.

What Rewards Do Whistleblowers Receive?

The FCA provides financial incentives for whistleblowers through a share of any recovery:

• Government Intervention Cases: If the government intervenes and the case is successful, the relator receives 15 to 25 percent of the recovery.
• Non-Intervention Cases: If the government declines to intervene and the relator proceeds independently and prevails, the relator receives 25 to 30 percent of the recovery.

Given that FCA recoveries can reach tens or hundreds of millions of dollars, the relator's share can be substantial. In fiscal year 2023, the Department of Justice recovered over $2.68 billion in FCA settlements and judgments.

What Whistleblower Protections Exist?

The FCA includes robust anti-retaliation provisions to protect whistleblowers:

• Employment Protection: Employers cannot discharge, demote, suspend, threaten, harass, or discriminate against employees who file or assist in qui tam actions.
• Remedies for Retaliation: Employees who suffer retaliation can seek reinstatement with full seniority, double back pay with interest, and compensation for special damages including litigation costs and attorney's fees.
• Broad Coverage: Protection extends not only to the person who files the qui tam action but also to employees who investigate, testify, or assist in any FCA action.

Beyond the FCA, other federal and state laws provide additional whistleblower protections in specific contexts, including the Dodd-Frank Act (securities fraud), the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (corporate fraud), and various state false claims acts.

What Is the Public Disclosure Bar?

The FCA includes a public disclosure bar that limits qui tam actions based on information already in the public domain. If the allegations have already been publicly disclosed through government reports, hearings, audits, or news media, the action may be barred unless the relator qualifies as an "original source" of the information. The Affordable Care Act amended this provision, making it a defense the defendant must raise rather than a jurisdictional bar.

The Paralegal's Role in Qui Tam Litigation

Paralegals working on qui tam cases handle specialized tasks including organizing and cataloging evidence, preparing the disclosure statement, managing document-heavy investigations, and coordinating with government attorneys during the intervention phase. Understanding the unique procedural requirements is essential for effective assistance.

Review qui tam and whistleblower concepts using our flashcard system. Create your free account to access practice questions on civil litigation topics, and explore our premium plans for comprehensive CP exam preparation.