Intentional Torts vs Negligence: Key Differences for the Paralegal Exam
Two Core Categories of Tort Liability
Tort law covers civil wrongs that cause harm to another person, and the two categories that appear most often on paralegal certification exams are intentional torts and negligence. Both can lead to a damages award, but they differ in what the plaintiff must prove, what defenses apply, and what remedies are available. Understanding the contrast will help you quickly categorize any fact pattern you see on the exam.
What Is an Intentional Tort?
An intentional tort occurs when the defendant acts with the purpose of bringing about a result, or knows with substantial certainty that the result will follow from the act. The key point is that the defendant must intend the act and its consequences, not necessarily intend to cause harm in the sense of malice. A person who shoves a friend as a joke and causes an injury may still have committed battery if the contact was intended and offensive.
What Are the Most Common Intentional Torts?
- Battery: Intentional harmful or offensive contact with another person.
- Assault: Intentional act that creates a reasonable apprehension of imminent harmful or offensive contact. Words alone are usually not enough.
- False imprisonment: Intentional confinement within fixed boundaries without consent or legal justification.
- Intentional infliction of emotional distress: Extreme and outrageous conduct that intentionally or recklessly causes severe emotional distress.
- Trespass to land: Intentional physical invasion of another's real property.
- Trespass to chattels and conversion: Interference with personal property. Conversion is serious enough that the defendant may be required to pay the full value of the item.
- Defamation: Publication of a false statement of fact that harms reputation. Libel is written, slander is spoken.
- Fraud and misrepresentation: Knowingly false statement, intent to induce reliance, justifiable reliance, and damages.
What Is Negligence?
Negligence is a failure to exercise reasonable care that results in harm. The defendant does not need to intend any harm. Instead, liability rests on conduct that falls below the standard of a reasonably prudent person under similar circumstances. Negligence is the most common tort claim and underlies car accident, slip and fall, and medical malpractice cases.
What Are the Elements of Negligence?
- Duty: The defendant owed the plaintiff a legal duty of care.
- Breach: The defendant failed to meet the standard of care.
- Causation: The breach was both the actual cause (the but for test) and the proximate cause (foreseeability) of the injury.
- Damages: The plaintiff suffered actual harm.
The absence of actual damages is fatal to a negligence claim. By contrast, certain intentional torts such as battery, trespass to land, and false imprisonment allow nominal damages even without proof of actual harm.
How Do the Two Categories Compare?
Mental state. Intentional torts require intent. Negligence requires only carelessness. Between them lies recklessness, where the defendant consciously disregards a substantial and unjustifiable risk. Reckless conduct can support punitive damages.
Damages. In negligence, the plaintiff must prove actual damages and can recover compensatory damages for medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering. In intentional tort cases, compensatory damages are available and punitive damages are more likely because the conduct is more culpable.
Scope of liability. In intentional torts, the defendant is often liable for all harm that results, even unforeseeable harm, under the eggshell plaintiff rule. In negligence, liability is limited by proximate cause to harms that were reasonably foreseeable, although the eggshell plaintiff rule also applies to the extent of the injury once a foreseeable injury occurs.
Insurance. Most liability insurance policies cover negligence but exclude intentional acts, which affects who ultimately pays a judgment.
What Defenses Apply to Each?
Intentional torts are defended with consent, self-defense, defense of others, defense of property, necessity, and privilege such as the shopkeeper's privilege. Negligence defenses include contributory negligence (a complete bar in a small number of states), comparative negligence (reduces recovery in most states), assumption of the risk, and the statute of limitations. Comparative negligence is not generally a defense to intentional torts.
Can One Event Give Rise to Both Claims?
Yes. A bar fight might lead to a battery claim against the aggressor and a negligence claim against the bar for failing to provide adequate security. The plaintiff may plead both theories in the alternative. Pay attention to the facts. If the defendant deliberately aimed a punch, the claim is battery. If the defendant carelessly swung a bag and hit someone, the claim is more likely negligence.
Common Exam Traps
- Confusing intent to act with intent to harm. For most intentional torts, only intent to perform the act is needed.
- Treating negligence as requiring a physical injury. Emotional distress claims have special rules, but economic harm may also be recoverable in some contexts.
- Forgetting transferred intent. If the defendant intends to hit A but strikes B, the intent transfers and the defendant is liable to B for battery.
- Overlooking vicarious liability. Employers are liable under respondeat superior for torts of employees acting within the scope of employment, including some intentional torts.
How Paralegals Apply This Knowledge
When intake interviews begin, paralegals gather the facts that tell the attorney whether the case sounds in intent or negligence. They collect incident reports, medical records, witness contact information, photographs, and insurance policies, and they calendar the statute of limitations. Because limitation periods differ by tort type and jurisdiction, accurate classification is more than an academic exercise.
Build your confidence with tort law flashcards, create a free account to test yourself with practice questions, and review the available plans when you are ready for the complete question bank.
Ready to start studying?
Join thousands of paralegals preparing for the CP exam with ParalegalPrep.